Haproxy: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
** A lot of work | ** A lot of work | ||
** Might kill sub-second performance? Might not. We already have delayed-write. | ** Might kill sub-second performance? Might not. We already have delayed-write. | ||
For the first 1000 users, we will NOT do load balancing. | |||
Instead, we will just use haproxy to redirect (bitpost.com IP) + port 8080 requests to abettertrader.com (all https). | |||
Revision as of 14:18, 9 May 2017
Two database design choices:
- Each server gets its own quotes and saves all its own data
- Need to read user id from each request and send each user to a predetermined server
- Need multiple Etrade accounts, one for each server, unless we get a deal with Etrade
- Switch to a distributed database with master-master replication
- A lot of work
- Might kill sub-second performance? Might not. We already have delayed-write.
For the first 1000 users, we will NOT do load balancing.
Instead, we will just use haproxy to redirect (bitpost.com IP) + port 8080 requests to abettertrader.com (all https).