JSON: Difference between revisions
(→Header) |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==== Warnings ==== | ==== Warnings ==== | ||
* YOU CAN'T USE `using namespace boost::json` without fucking up std::string! Arrogant boost author decided his string was better - fine - but name it something else you ass. | |||
* You can't extract easily from a const object with brackets (it [https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_77_0/libs/json/doc/html/json/ref/boost__json__object/operator_lb__rb_.html has no const version] because it returns a reference). What bullshit. | |||
# Nope, not gonna work, you can't use [] on a const object, durrr... | |||
string order = jMsg["client_order_id"].as_string().c_str(); | |||
# Workaround one liner | |||
string order = jMsg.at("client_order_id").as_string().c_str(); | |||
==== Header ==== | ==== Header ==== |
Revision as of 16:03, 6 September 2021
JSON is as simple as possible but no less. Genius.
C++
We will use boost::json wherever possible. Keep updating it, and move to c++ std json if it becomes a thing. We still use nlohmann for quicktype and postgres-jsonb.
Warnings
- YOU CAN'T USE `using namespace boost::json` without fucking up std::string! Arrogant boost author decided his string was better - fine - but name it something else you ass.
- You can't extract easily from a const object with brackets (it has no const version because it returns a reference). What bullshit.
# Nope, not gonna work, you can't use [] on a const object, durrr... string order = jMsg["client_order_id"].as_string().c_str(); # Workaround one liner string order = jMsg.at("client_order_id").as_string().c_str();
Header
when we need nlohmann: using nlohmann::json; when we need boost: // boost/json.hpp using boost::json::object; // << most common! using boost::json::array; using boost::json::value; // << avoid, too generic using boost::json::value_from; using boost::json::parse; using boost::json::serialize; using boost::json::kind; // OR: Use auto to short-circuit the bullshit whenever possible. auto jBars = jResponse["bars"].as_array();
Examples
use these: // CONSTRUCTING object j; j["my-name"] = "Heisenburg"; j["my-number"] = 42; object jv = { { "pi", 3.141 }, { "happy", true }, { "name", "Boost" }, { "nothing", nullptr }, { "answer", { { "everything", 42 } } }, {"list", {1, 0, 2}}, { "object", { { "currency", "USD" }, { "value", 42.99 } } } }; // PARSING object jBody = parse(payload).as_object(); if ( !jBody.if_contains( "sub" ) || !jBody.if_contains( "role" )) return; sub_ = jBody["sub"].as_string(); role_ = jBody["role"].as_int64(); // NOTE you can't do an assignment for some reason...? FAIL: string sub = jBody["sub"].as_string(); // But you can provide a constructor param. Just weird. string sub( jBody["sub"].as_string() ); // OUTPUT ss << j; string strMyJ = serialize( j );
String literals for hardcoded JSON
- You can use C++ string literals for hardcoded JSON, easier to read than the initializer list squiggly-bracket nightmare:
R"( { "name": "blah", "number": 123 } )";
Library history
- rapidjson: I started with this. It is brutally low-level and cumbersome (fast? not to develop against...).
- nlohmann: This was great to code with. Very elegant and straightforward. I moved towards boost to get better performance and a library with "more eyeballs". But this is still used by quicktype, which is used by my Postgres template code, which is really nice... and even tho quicktype is kinda dead... I'm keeping it for as long as I can.
- boost: I started using boost::json on boost v 1.77, when it seemed to be generally not insane (like its predecessor property_tree/spirit/bleh was...). It's slightly cumbersome, not that bad, and hopefully will get better.