Off-world Power Generation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary  | 
				No edit summary  | 
				||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
PV energy collection  | PV energy collection  | ||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_photovoltaic_power_stations PV power stations] collect more power than [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_solar_thermal_power_stations solar thermal power stations].  They seem to average ~  | * [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_photovoltaic_power_stations PV power stations] collect more power than [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_solar_thermal_power_stations solar thermal power stations].  They seem to average ~3 MW/km^2 (throwing out 2 ridiculous outliers).  | ||
*   | * Traditional single-junction cells have a maximum theoretical efficiency of 33.16% [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cell_efficiency more].  In reality it is around [https://www.solarpowerrocks.com/solar-basics/how-much-electricity-does-a-solar-panel-produce/#top10 18.7%].  | ||
*   | * A 65"x39" (1.64 m^2) solar panel made in 2018 [https://www.solarpowerrocks.com/solar-basics/how-much-electricity-does-a-solar-panel-produce/#top10 produces ~320W].  | ||
* About 48% of solar energy hitting the Earth reaches the surface.  Perhaps optimistic, but we will divide by .48 to get energy-in-space vs on-earth.  | |||
* Approximate energy absorbable by a solar panel in space: 320W / 1.64m^2 / .48% = 400W/m^2 in space  | |||
* Approximate required size of a solar array "near Earth" (including l1) to power NYC: 100GW / 400W/m^s = 250 sq km  | |||
Revision as of 00:22, 29 October 2018
Given:
- earth to moon: 238,900 miles
 - there are four lagrange points that provide constant sun exposure at predictable locations
 - l1 to earth/moon: 1 million miles
 - the sun primarily produces visible light (not microwaves or gamma...)
 - laser transmission is more efficient than microwave, except where earth's atmosphere interferes
 - current status: A Gigawatt-range microwave system would weigh ~80,000 tons (prohibitively expensive) more lots more
 - Solar cell efficiency
 
Premises:
<Earth> <-microwave-- <Earth-orbit satellite> <-laser-- <Earth's moon> <-laser-- <L1 solar array> <Earth> <-clearsky-burst-laser-- <Earth's moon> <-laser-- <L1 solar array> <Earth> <-clearsky-burst-laser-- <L1 solar array>
- <Earth> <- <Earth-orbit satellite>
 
Laser transmit antenna in space: 1 meter diameter per GW Receive: Several hundred meters across
- <Earth-orbit satellite> <- <Earth's moon>
 
- <Earth's moon> <- <Earth-Sol Lagrange-point solar array>
 
Targeting the energy requirement of NYC:
- Power is measured in Newton-meters per second or Joules per second or Watts.
 - ~3000 trillion BTU in 2016 = 3000 trillion btu / 365 days = 3.4E+11 btu/hr = 1.0036680479e+11 watts = 100 GW
 
PV energy collection
- PV power stations collect more power than solar thermal power stations. They seem to average ~3 MW/km^2 (throwing out 2 ridiculous outliers).
 - Traditional single-junction cells have a maximum theoretical efficiency of 33.16% more. In reality it is around 18.7%.
 - A 65"x39" (1.64 m^2) solar panel made in 2018 produces ~320W.
 - About 48% of solar energy hitting the Earth reaches the surface. Perhaps optimistic, but we will divide by .48 to get energy-in-space vs on-earth.
 - Approximate energy absorbable by a solar panel in space: 320W / 1.64m^2 / .48% = 400W/m^2 in space
 - Approximate required size of a solar array "near Earth" (including l1) to power NYC: 100GW / 400W/m^s = 250 sq km