Off-world Power Generation Components: Difference between revisions
No edit summary  | 
				No edit summary  | 
				||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Reference implementations will be subject to constant improvement, with '''new proposals welcome from any interested party at any time'''.  | Reference implementations will be subject to constant improvement, with '''new proposals welcome from any interested party at any time'''.  | ||
* New proposals must be well-documented and repeatable.  | |||
* Any  efficiency improvement of at least 2% with no more than a 10% cost increase will automatically qualify to be the new reference standard.  | * Any  efficiency improvement of at least 2% with no more than a 10% cost increase will automatically qualify to be the new reference standard.  | ||
* Any cost reduction of at least 0.5% with no loss in efficiency will automatically qualify to be the new reference standard.  | * Any cost reduction of at least 0.5% with no loss in efficiency will automatically qualify to be the new reference standard.  | ||
*   | * Other special cases will be accepted for review by the board.  | ||
* Higher-cost efficiency improvements   | ** Higher-cost efficiency improvements - the board will consider the cost impact on the success of the project.     | ||
* Lower-cost improvements that result in a "statistically insignificant" efficiency loss   | ** Lower-cost improvements that result in a "statistically insignificant" efficiency loss.  | ||
* Cross-component concerns (eg, amount of storage capability required)   | ** Cross-component concerns (eg, amount of storage capability required)  | ||
* Requirements are subject to change by the board at any time as needed.  | ** Requirements are subject to change by the board at any time as needed.  | ||
Revision as of 04:18, 16 January 2019
Each component will have a reference implementation with a black box efficiency and cost rating.
Reference implementations will be subject to constant improvement, with new proposals welcome from any interested party at any time.
- New proposals must be well-documented and repeatable.
 - Any efficiency improvement of at least 2% with no more than a 10% cost increase will automatically qualify to be the new reference standard.
 - Any cost reduction of at least 0.5% with no loss in efficiency will automatically qualify to be the new reference standard.
 - Other special cases will be accepted for review by the board.
- Higher-cost efficiency improvements - the board will consider the cost impact on the success of the project.
 - Lower-cost improvements that result in a "statistically insignificant" efficiency loss.
 - Cross-component concerns (eg, amount of storage capability required)
 - Requirements are subject to change by the board at any time as needed.
 
 
| Description | Requirements | Reference implementation | Efficiency | Cost | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Off-world solar collection | Lab 1: Free Space 1W Transmission | 15.6 | W/kg | 1.15 | $/W | |
| Off-world solar storage | 
  | 
Lab 1: Free Space 1W Transmission | 44 | Wh/kg | 1.45 | $/Wh | 
| Off-world solar transmission | 
  | 
Lab 2: Laser aiming | TBD | Wh % | TBD | $/Wh | 
| Earthbound solar collection | 
  | 
Lab 2: Laser aiming | TBD | Wh % | TBD | $/Wh | 
| Launch off-world gear | TBD | - | TBD | $/kg | ||
| Robotic self-assembly of off-world gear | 
  | 
TBD | - | TBD | $/kg | |