Off-world Power Generation Components: Difference between revisions

From Bitpost wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
Reference implementations will be subject to constant improvement, with '''new proposals welcome from any interested party at any time'''.
Reference implementations will be subject to constant improvement, with '''new proposals welcome from any interested party at any time'''.


* New proposals must be well-documented and repeatable.
* Any  efficiency improvement of at least 2% with no more than a 10% cost increase will automatically qualify to be the new reference standard.
* Any  efficiency improvement of at least 2% with no more than a 10% cost increase will automatically qualify to be the new reference standard.
* Any cost reduction of at least 0.5% with no loss in efficiency will automatically qualify to be the new reference standard.
* Any cost reduction of at least 0.5% with no loss in efficiency will automatically qualify to be the new reference standard.
* New proposals must be well-documented and repeatable.
* Other special cases will be accepted for review by the board.
* Higher-cost efficiency improvements will be accepted for review by the board, who will consider the cost impact on the success of the project.   
** Higher-cost efficiency improvements - the board will consider the cost impact on the success of the project.   
* Lower-cost improvements that result in a "statistically insignificant" efficiency loss will be accepted for review by the board.
** Lower-cost improvements that result in a "statistically insignificant" efficiency loss.
* Cross-component concerns (eg, amount of storage capability required) will be considered by the board as needed.
** Cross-component concerns (eg, amount of storage capability required)
* Requirements are subject to change by the board at any time as needed.
** Requirements are subject to change by the board at any time as needed.





Revision as of 04:18, 16 January 2019

Each component will have a reference implementation with a black box efficiency and cost rating.

Reference implementations will be subject to constant improvement, with new proposals welcome from any interested party at any time.

  • New proposals must be well-documented and repeatable.
  • Any efficiency improvement of at least 2% with no more than a 10% cost increase will automatically qualify to be the new reference standard.
  • Any cost reduction of at least 0.5% with no loss in efficiency will automatically qualify to be the new reference standard.
  • Other special cases will be accepted for review by the board.
    • Higher-cost efficiency improvements - the board will consider the cost impact on the success of the project.
    • Lower-cost improvements that result in a "statistically insignificant" efficiency loss.
    • Cross-component concerns (eg, amount of storage capability required)
    • Requirements are subject to change by the board at any time as needed.


Description Requirements Reference implementation Efficiency Cost
Off-world solar collection Lab 1: Free Space 1W Transmission 15.6 W/kg 1.15 $/W
Off-world solar storage
  • Storage capability sufficient for periods where transmission is offline
Lab 1: Free Space 1W Transmission 44 Wh/kg 1.45 $/Wh
Off-world solar transmission
  • Transmitter/receiver handshake
    • for precision aiming
    • for safety, with instant power laser cutoff when interrupted
  • Cyber-security best practices
Lab 2: Laser aiming TBD Wh % TBD $/Wh
Earthbound solar collection
  • Sufficient ground area to capture transmitted energy
  • Transmission/receiver handshake
Lab 2: Laser aiming TBD Wh % TBD $/Wh
Launch off-world gear TBD - TBD $/kg
Robotic self-assembly of off-world gear
  • Establishment of orbit and assembly of initial gear
  • Orbital delivery and assembly of supplemental gear
TBD - TBD $/kg